Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Guillaume Dermiens vs Cedric Stanke Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Dermiens vs Stanke analysis and find out who is favored!
Guillaume Dermiens vs Cedric Stanke Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Dermiens 1 - 0 Stanke
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Dermiens has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Stanke has won 48.65%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Dermiens, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stanke has won 56.52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 34.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Dermiens has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stanke has saved 57.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Dermiens has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Stanke winning 53.7% (W/L 29/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Dermiens has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 35/ 29), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Stanke has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 27/ 18), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 31/ 48).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Dermiens winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Dermiens winning 2 and Stanke winning 0. The last match between Dermiens and Stanke was at the M15 Huy, 22-08-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Guillaume Dermiens getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Dermiens and Stanke have played a deciding set 0 times, with Dermiens winning 0 times and Stanke 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Dermiens winning 0, and Stanke 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Dermiens has played against opponents with an average rank of while Stanke has played against players with an average rank of 39.69.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Dermiens has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stanke has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Dermiens has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stanke has converted 40.54% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
49% (66-69)
Career Total W/L
46% (59-68)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
56% (9-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Guillaume Dermiens | Cedric Stanke |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:0 | 1:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (37/52) | 64% (37/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (27/37) | 59% (22/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (7/15) | 24% (5/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (31/58) | 35% (18/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Guillaume Dermiens
Player
Cedric Stanke
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Guillaume Dermiens | Cedric Stanke |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (9/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (20/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (194/186) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 21 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.11 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 20 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:6:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 85.31 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (453/675) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 64% (290/453) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (108/222) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 41% (30/74) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (302/713) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (9/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (9/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (8/2) |
Guillaume Dermiens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-7(4) 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Guillaume Dermiens
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
82%
(
62 of
76)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 4-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Cedric Stanke Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathys Domenc
Player
Cedric Stanke
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Cedric Stanke
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cedric Stanke
Player
Albert Saar
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cedric Stanke
Player
Jonathan Stenberg
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
17 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Grigoriy Lomakin
Player
Cedric Stanke
79%
(
74 of
94)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 6-7(7) 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 7-6(8) 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Cedric Stanke
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
73%
(
59 of
81)
10
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cedric Stanke
Player
Nour Fathalla
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
90
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cedric Stanke
Player
Vladimir Uzhylovsky
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 7-5 10-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Dermiens Vs Stanke Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
